
The Sandford Fleming Medal & Citation
Celebrating Excellence in Science Communication
Since 1982, RCIScience has awarded the Sandford Fleming Medal and Citation annually to an individual working in Canada who has made outstanding contributions to science communication.
Nominations for the 2025 Sandford Fleming Medal are now open.
The nomination (2 pages maximum) should include a description of the nominee’s work and how it has impacted the public's understanding of science across Canada. Outreach should communicate science broadly and reach a wide audience. Where possible, please provide at least two letters supporting the nomination.
Nominations or questions can be emailed to: information@rciscience.ca
Nominations must be submitted by June 30 2025.
“We are living in a time when the very foundations of science and truth are under attack globally. Propaganda, doubt and disinformation have taken up residence in the public discourse to a degree I find alarming. So receiving this award, this year, is a sweet validation that the task of democratizing science matters, and that we have to keep doing it!”
— Alanna Mitchell, 2024 Sandford Fleming Medal & Citation Recipient
PAST RECIPIENTS
Alanna Mitchell
Terry Collins
Dawn Bazely
André Picard
Timothy Caulfield
Dan Falk
John Smol
Pierre Chastenay
Ivan Semeniuk
Molly Shoichet
Penny Park
Chris Hadfield
Robert Thirsk
John Dirks
Paul Delaney
David Schindler
Henry Lickers
Peter Calamai
Paul Fjeld
Joe Schwarcz
M. Brock Fenton
Robert Buckman
Bob McDonald
J. N. Patterson Hume
Ursula Martius Franklin
John Charles Polanyi
Sid Katz
John R. Percy
Derek York
Eve Savory
Edward Struzik
Carol Gold
Terence Dickinson
Annabel Slaight
Joan Hollobon
Marilyn Dunlop
Fred Bruemmer
Fernand Seguin
J. Tuzo Wilson
Jay Ingram
Helen Sawyer Hogg
Lister Sinclair
Lydia Dotto
David Suzuki
Nomination Details
Eligibility
Any individual working in a registered non-profit organization, post-secondary institution, museum, science centre or company, or freelance science communication professional within Canada may be nominated for the award.
Nominees will have made a successful and sustained effort to communicate science to the public to increase understanding of the broader area of natural sciences, social science, multi-disciplinary sciences, medicine, engineering, math and technology [“science”] outside of their specific area of expertise.
Consideration will be given to those nominees who have demonstrated their ability to speak about a broad range of scientific topics, not just their own research.
The individual must be able to speak to a general adult population (not K-12).
Posthumous or self-nominations will not be accepted.
Current RCIScience Board members are not eligible for nomination.
Past winners of a Fleming Medal are not eligible to be nominated a second time.
In order to qualify, the achievements of any nominee must be distinct from the organization as a whole.
Nomination Process and Selection Criteria
Anyone with direct knowledge of an individual’s contribution to science communication may nominate that candidate for the Fleming Medal.
Nominators may be colleagues or people who have benefited from the nominee’s contributions, such as teachers, parents, community members or administrators.
Such nominations may be supported by a letter from the organization confirming the distinct nature of the activities. Furthermore, no consideration will be given to any aspect of the organization or its activities during the review process.
The nomination package must include:
A completed, signed Science Communication Nomination Form submitted to the Executive Director, RCIScience, by the nomination deadline.
A letter or document (two pages maximum) that describes, or summarizes, the nominee’s:
efforts and involvement in inspiring public understanding of science;
the content, originality and scope of the nominee’s activities;
approach to science communication, including creativity in public engagement;
recent successful science communication or engagement activities demonstrating a diversity of audiences including, if possible, the impact and duration of the nominee’s activities (Note: Nominators are encouraged to include specific measures of impact).
Two signed letters of recommendation (no more than two pages each), or as deemed appropriate by the Awards Committee.
Supporting documentation (such as promotional material, participant feedback, media coverage, publications, awards) (no more than five pages).
Selection Process
Nominations are reviewed by the Awards Committee of the RCIScience Board of Directors.
The Chair of the RCIScience Board of Directors is the Chair of the Awards Committee, or a member nominated by the Chair of the Board of Directors.
It is recognized that occasionally members of the Awards Committee will know applicants or have other conflicts of interest. They will be expected to declare all such knowledge and conflicts of interests.
In the case of knowing an applicant the Chair of the selection panel will rule if this is significant enough for the Committee member to stand down for that applicant.
The Committee will not enter into any correspondence concerning its deliberations. All inquiries should be directed to the RCIScience Executive Director. Note that information on matters such as ranking, or names of unsuccessful nominees, will not be disclosed.
Nominations will be kept active for two years following submission to the RCIScience.
In any year, the Awards Committee will reserve the right to encourage submissions and award early and mid-career nominees, or honour someone late in their career.
If no nominations are deemed suitable, no award will be made.
Award Process
The award recipient will be expected to make themselves available without fee to give a public presentation about their achievements in science communication at which the Fleming Medal will be publicly awarded.
If the venue is at a significant distance from the award recipient’s home, the RCIScience will compensate for reasonable travel expenses. Alternatively, a virtual event may be held.