An introduction to the who, what, where, when, why and how of science communication.
If I Had a Million Dollars (Panel Summary)
Are We Selling or Selling Out Science? (Panel Summary)
There's a natural tension between use of scientific communication by institutions and other agendas such as philanthropy. This panel addressed the issue from both sides - the need to attract awareness and support and the need to ensure what is communicated is not hyperbole or exaggeration. This relates to trust in science, especially when there is misrepresentation of facts and over-promising of, for example, cures
How to Succeed in SciComm (Panel Summary)
Canada vs The World (Panel Summary)
Interviewing: The Art of Asking Questions
Fostering Dialogue for Public Engagement
Creative Solutions to Misinformation
What's Curriculum Got To Do With It?
Scaling Your Talk
Understanding Science Capital
Hook, Line and Sinker: How to Write a Headline
Communicating with Intent
Measuring Up: The Art of Evaluation
“We measure what we value and we value what we measure.”
Even with the best of intentions, funders won’t continue to support projects that aren’t getting results. Counting visitors, feedback forms and cherry picking quotes are tools that can provide some insight, but never give the whole picture. This workshop highlighted innovative and robust approaches to evaluating SciComm activities, and explored evidence-based techniques that help prove we’re achieving what we set out to do and quantifiably improve how we’re doing it.